Saturday, August 27, 2016


Source Article:
How to Protect Yourself if You are Force-Vaccinated

Vaccinations have a strong history of causing damage to health. The very first vaccination for smallpox caused tremendous health damage, while also increasing the incidence of small pox. The damage caused by polio vaccinations continued this trend. Newer vaccinations continue to destroy health and even kill their recipients. [1]

While many are able to choose to refuse this dangerous medical procedure, others are threatened with refusal of entry in day care, schools, and universities if they remain unvaccinated. Others are forced to choose between employment or vaccinations. Pressure to vaccinate is especially strong for those employed by health care and the US military.

While the best option is to employ whatever exemptions may exist in your state, for many individuals, there appears to be no good escape route. This is a very sad state of affairs.

Individuals caught in this predicament may still choose to use health practices which will reduce the likelihood of vaccine health damage.

One Vaccination at a Time

It makes sense that reducing the toxic load would reduce the potential damage of vaccinations. Obtaining as few vaccines at one time as possible should logically reduce the risks for damage. Obtaining only one vaccine at a time is the best option, if one chooses to vaccinate.

Statistical data on vaccine damage supports this idea. Medical researcher Neil Z. Miller warns parents to avoid multiple vaccines at one visit, which can lead to serious reactions, including death. Miller discovered that 5.4 percent of vaccine reactions for those receiving five or more vaccines were fatal. Due to underreporting of vaccine injuries, this number is likely to be much higher.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) continues to recommend infants receive eight vaccines (polio, diphtheria, hepatitis B, rotavirus, pneumococcal, tetanus, haemophilus influenza B and pertussis) at ages 2, 4 and 6 months, in spite of no safety studies. [2]

Avoid Vaccines When Ill

While conventionally trained physicians will almost always recommend vaccinating a sick child or adult, integrative-minded practitioners warn against this practice. The immune system is already compromised, so introducing more toxins to the body will more likely overwhelm the individual’s fight to detoxify. [3]

Do NOT Use Acetaminophen with Vaccinations

Comparing children in Cuba to those in the US, autism rates were significantly lower in Cuba. Several practices can account for this, including less and safer vaccine use in Cuba.

Another practice difference discovered was the routine use of acetaminophen prior to and after vaccines in the US. Acetaminophen found in Tylenol is used for pain relief, but it also reduces the production of glutathione, a powerful antioxidant used to eliminate toxins. [4]

Vitamin C

Vitamin C has been shown in several studies to be highly effective at neutralizing the neurotoxin mercury which is found in many vaccines. It is recommended to take vitamin C prior to and after vaccinations. Dr. Russell Blaylock recommends 1,000 milligrams of buffered vitamin C four times daily between meals in his vaccination detox protocol. [5, 6]

Use of Detox and Immune-Strengthening Protocol

Dr. Russell Blaylock is a respected neurosurgeon who has written extensively about vaccine dangers. Dr. Blaylock has outlined a detailed protocol which can be used to reduce the effects of toxic vaccinations.

Dr. Blaylock’s first suggestion is to bring a cold pack with you when vaccinated, and place on the injection site as soon as possible to help block an immune reaction. A cold pack and cold showers can also be used the following day.

Blaylocks’s protocol includes the use of several powerful, safe antioxidants curcumin, quercetin and EPA omega 3 one hour prior to vaccination, as well as several days following vaccines.

Blaylock recommends children take 5,000 units of D3 and adults 20,000 units of D3 for two weeks following vaccinations. The natural form of vitamin E, high in gamma-E, is recommended to reduce inflammatory cytokines. Taking a multivitamin high in B vitamins and selenium, but absent of iron, is also suggested.

Other suggested supplementation include magnesium citrate, zinc, calcium and astaxanthin.

Blaylock also recommends 8 ounces of detox smoothies with parsley and celery, taken twice daily.

Holistic physician Sircus has a very similar detox protocol to Dr. Blaylock, with a cold pack and vitamin C dosing as a first line of defense. Sircus emphasizes using baking soda to neutralize the poisons contained in vaccinations. Sircus recommends water hydration to help detoxify the body, as well as magnesium and spirulina. He also stresses the importance of using vitamins and nutrients, referencing Blaylock’s protocol, as well as avoiding other toxins in the environment. [7]


Avoiding vaccines is the best line of defense against exposure to dangerous toxins. If one is faced with the necessity to vaccinate, there are several important health measures which may reduce damage.

Not vaccinating when ill, and spreading out vaccinations as much as possible can reduce likelihood of vaccine damage.

Use of a cold pack immediately following vaccination can help block an immune reaction. Use of vitamin C before and after vaccination is considered critical. Deciding on a protocol inclusive of several antioxidants including vitamins D3 and E is important. Smoothies made with celery and parsley and/or use of baking soda can help detox poisons from the body.

Avoiding acetaminophen before and after vaccinations is also a helpful guideline.
Many individuals understandably feel helpless when forced to vaccinate by their employers or schools, but utilizing these recommendations can hopefully minimize the negative impact of vaccinations.


Thursday, August 25, 2016



Source Article:
Free Sperm For All: Jewish Married Man Offers Free Sperm Behind Wife’s Back

TIMES OF ISRAEL – Ari Nagel’s wife said to be ‘devastated’ by news he provides sperm via intercourse or in a cup to women looking to have a baby without using sperm banks.

A jewish math professor from Brooklyn who sired 22 children over the past 18 years is a married man raising three children with his wife.

Ari Nagel, 40, who in last week’s New York Post said he provides his sperm for free — through intercourse or in a cup — to lesbian couples and single women looking to have a babyand who cannot afford the expense of a sperm bank, revealed on Sunday that he has been married for the past 12 years and has three children with his wife, ages 12, five and two.

In last week’s article, Nagel said he often produces the sperm in a men’s bathroom at Target or Starbucks, giving it to the recipient in a menstrual cup, who then immediately inserts it in the ladies room. Nagel attributed his success in helping women conceive to his high sperm count, coupled with his good looks and attractive personality.

According to Nagel, a math professor at CUNY Kingsborough, his wife Roxanne knew about his extra-curricular activities even if she wasn’t thrilled.

“She was never happy about all these other kids, but she tolerated it,” he told the Post after a reader who came upon the initial article said she was “devastated” by the article and “had no idea this was happening.”

Nagel did admit that his wife was “livid” and “yelling at me a lot” after the article was published but said that their marriage has been on the rocks for years and that they sleep in separate bedrooms.

The math professor said the two had a “complicated” marriage and that even as “she knew what was going on, she didn’t support it. She always wanted me to be a regular, traditional spouse.”

His wife Roxanne, reached outside her home by the Post said: “I have nothing to say. What’s done is done.”

According to the report, Nagel is set to sire a 23rd child after impregnating another single mom, and has received additional requests in the “triple digits” for his sperm.

He said he’s heard from women “all over the world, places I never heard of. Almost all of them want to have a baby, but some want to hook up.”

Nagel said he was raised in an Orthodox Jewish family with six siblings, and through his sperm donations can have a lot of children and still sleep at night.

“I just love seeing how happy the moms and kids are … That’s why I do this. It’s the gift that keeps on giving,” he told the Post.

He said he babysits for some of the kids and attends birthday parties, and was present at some of the deliveries.

He has successfully been sued for child support five times and told the Post that half of his paycheck is garnished for child support. He told the newspaper that the women all promise in advance that they won’t sue.

He has kids in Florida, Illinois, Virginia, Connecticut and Israel, and said he does not regret any of them.


The following post got me banned from facebook for 30 days, perhaps because the article discusses the fact that teenagers are connecting with pornography through facebook!!! Pornography pops up on their screen while they are trying to talk with their friends.

Of course, we all know that facebook is wholly controlled by Jews and that Jews totally control the pornography industry. They have used this Luciferian weapon to hijack the sexuality of young people, especially boys.

Jews have also mainstreamed circumcision in the U.S. -- that is to say they have mainstreamed the sexual torture and genital mutilation of infants whose neurological wires will be imprinted with a connection between sex and violence because they were sexually tortured straight out of the womb.

All parents have a responsibility to address what is happening to the boys and understand who is behind this evil. At every turn, you will find it is THE JEWS.

Source Article:
Experiment that convinced me online porn is the most pernicious threat facing children today: By ex-lads' mag editor MARTIN DAUBNEY

As the presenter of a Channel 4 documentary called Porn On The Brain, airing next Monday at 10pm, I'd been invited to sit in on a forward-thinking class led by sex education consultant Jonny Hunt, who is regularly asked into schools to discuss sex and relationships. To establish what these kids knew about sex - including pornography - he had asked the children to write an A-Z list of the sexual terms they knew, no matter how extreme.

Most of these children had just hit puberty and some were clearly still children: wide-eyed, nervous, with high-pitched voices.

Some of the girls were beginning their first forays into make-up. Several wore braces on their teeth. Everybody was smartly turned out in school uniform, and the most anti-authority statement in the room was a tie worn deliberately short. A One Direction pencil case lay on a desk. These were clearly good children, from good homes. So far, so very, very ordinary.

But when Jonny pinned their lists on the board, it turned out that the children's extensive knowledge of porn terms was not only startling, it superseded that of every adult in the room - including the sex education consultant himself.

'Nugget, what's that?' asked Jonny.

'A nugget is a girl who has no arms or legs and has sex in a porno movie,' chortled one young, pimply boy, to an outburst of embarrassed laughter from some, and outright revulsion from others.

The adults in attendance were incredulous at the thought that not only did this kind of porn exist, but that a 14-year-old boy may have actually watched it.

But the more mundane answers were just as shocking. For example, the first word every single boy and girl in the group put on their list was 'anal'.

When questioned, they had all - every child in a class of 20 - seen sodomy acted out in porn videos. I was stunned they even knew about it - I certainly hadn't heard of it at that age - let alone had watched it and as a result may even have wanted to try it.

One 15-year-old girl said, 'Boys expect porn sex in real life'. And one boy - to choruses of approval - spoke of his revulsion for pubic hair, which he called a 'gorilla'.

When Jonny pointed out that pubic hair was normal in real life, the boys scoffed, but some of the girls were angry that the boys' template of what to expect from real girls had clearly already been set by porn.

By the end of the hour-long class - and three others that followed with other children - I was profoundly saddened by what I had witnessed. While teenage boys will always be fascinated by, and curious about, sex, what's now considered 'normal' by under-18s is an entirely distorted view of intercourse and the way relationships should be conducted.

It seemed as if the children's entire expectation of sex had been defined by what they see in online porn. The conversation was horrifying enough, yet there was worse to come.

In the playground, I interviewed a brave group of seven bright boys and girls aged 14-15 to ascertain in more detail what online porn they had witnessed.

'Nugget, what's that?' asked Jonny. 'A nugget is a girl who has no arms or legs and has sex in a porno movie,' chortled one young, pimply boy

One boy calmly recalled watching a scene too graphic to describe in a family newspaper, but which had involved an animal.
'You're watching bestiality?' I asked. 'That's illegal. Where are you getting this stuff from?'

'Facebook,' the boy said. 'It just pops up whether you want it or not, sometimes via advertisements. You don't have any control over it.'

A girl added, 'On Facebook, you just scroll down and it's there. If any of your friends like it, it comes up on your home page.'

These kids were balanced, smart and savvy. They were the most academically gifted and sporting in the school. They came from ordinary, hard-working households. This was not 'Broken Britain'.

Some were clearly shocked by what they had seen on the internet.

'I find it dirty and disturbing,' said one 15-year-old boy. 'I try not to look at it, but people just keep sending it to each other. They email disgusting links to each other's mobile phones to shock.'

One girl put her head in her hands and said, 'It's just gross'.

It's horrifying enough for parents to know that children can get porn via the internet. But to think they get it from Facebook - the social media currency that has become a universal must-have for teenagers globally - will strike terror into their hearts.

I asked the teenagers: 'On a scale of one to ten, how likely would you say it is that boys and girls your age are watching porn online?'

The reply was a chorus of tens, nines and one eight.

When I asked the children if there were parental controls on the internet at home, they all said no, their parents trusted them. They all admitted their parents had no idea what they were watching, and would be shocked if they did know.
What I saw at the school was awful, but sadly not unusual.

The findings were backed up in a survey of 80 boys and girls aged 12-16, commissioned for the TV show.

It proves the vast majority of UK teens have seen sexual imagery online, or pornographic films.

According to the survey, the boys appear largely happy about watching porn - and were twice as likely as girls to do so - but the girls are significantly more confused, angry and frightened by online sexual imagery. The more they see, the stronger they feel.

But what impact is this steady diet of online depravity having on the attitudes of boys and girls towards real life relationships, and on their self-esteem?

Could it even have a wider impact on their lives, blighting their ability to function in the world, get good qualifications and jobs?

What I discovered left me truly shocked and saddened.

You might be surprised. After all, from 2003-2010 I edited lad's magazine Loaded.

With its frequent nudity and lewd photo spreads, I'd long been accused of being a soft pornographer, and after leaving Loaded I agonised that my magazine may have switched a generation onto more explicit online porn.

In the documentary I set out on a journey to answer the question: is porn harmless, or is it damaging lives?

My interest was deeply personal, too, as my own beautiful little boy, Sonny, is now four. Even though he has only just started primary school, the Children's Commissioner estimates boys as young as ten are now being exposed to online porn.
I wanted to know what I could do to protect my own son from a seemingly inevitable exposure to hardcore material in just a few years' time.

I used to be sceptical that porn was as damaging a force as the headlines and David Cameron - who recently said it was 'corroding childhood' - suggest. In the past I'd even defended pornography in university debates, on TV and on radio. I claimed it was our freedom of choice to watch it and said it could actually help add to adult relationships.

But what I saw during the making of the film changed my opinion of pornography forever.

The true stories of boys I met whose lives had been totally taken over by porn not only moved me to tears but also made me incredibly angry that this is happening to our children.

And the looks of revulsion on those poor girl's faces in the playground enraged me.

I feel as if an entire generation's sexuality has been hijacked by grotesque online porn.

To find out what porn is doing to young men, and the girls they have relationships with, we spoke to them via online forums and discovered that there were many young lives seriously blighted by an excessive, unhealthy relationship with pornography that can begin when they are as young as 12.

We learned that some had lost their jobs, others had broken relationships, failed exams, or got into serious debt through using porn.

'When you interview young women about their experiences of sex, you see an increased level of violence: rough, violent sex. That is directly because of porn, as young boys are getting their sexual cues from men in porn who are acting as if they're sexual psychopaths'

Take the 19-year-old man I got to know. He was handsome, articulate and in full-time employment as an apprentice electrician. But his life was dominated by his porn habit.

'Every bit of spare time I have is spent watching porn,' he says. 'It is extreme. I can't hold down a relationship for longer than three weeks. I want porn sex with real girls, but sex with them just isn't as good as the porn.'

Having established, like the recent Children's Commissioner report, that 'basically, porn is everywhere', we set out to discover what all this porn was doing to their brains.

Was it having any effect at all? Could it be addictive?

We found Dr Valerie Voon, a neuroscientist at Cambridge University and a global authority on addiction.

Then, in the first study of its kind, we recruited 19 heavy porn users who felt their habit was out of control and had Dr Voon examine their brain activity as they watched, among other things, hardcore porn.

She showed them a variety of images, both stills and videos.

These ranged from images known to excite all men, such as bundles of £50 notes and extreme sports in action, to mundane landscapes and wallpapers - all inter-spliced with hardcore porn videos, plus pictures of both clothed and naked women.
The ways in which their brains responded to this diverse imagery were compared with the responses of a group of healthy volunteers.

She was interested in a particular brain region called the ventral striatum - the 'reward centre' - where our sense of pleasure is produced. This is one of the areas where an addict will show a heightened response to visual representations of their addiction - whether it's a syringe or a bottle of vodka.

'Letting our children consume it freely via the internet is like leaving heroin lying around the house'

What we discovered was a revelation. When shown porn, the reward centre of normal volunteers barely reacted, but that of the compulsive porn users lit up like a Christmas tree.

The compulsive porn users' brains showed clear parallels with those with substance addictions.

Everybody on the project was astounded, even Dr Voon, who admitted she had been 'sceptical and ambivalent' about the study at the outset.

If porn does have the insidious power to be addictive, then letting our children consume it freely via the internet is like leaving heroin lying around the house, or handing out vodka at the school gates.

And this toxic effect is filtering down directly into young girls' lives.

The most shocking testament came from Professor Gail Dines. Regarded as the world's leading anti-pornography campaigner, she has interviewed thousands of men and women about sex and pornography.

'When you interview young women about their experiences of sex, you see an increased level of violence: rough, violent sex,' she says.

'That is directly because of porn, as young boys are getting their sexual cues from men in porn who are acting as if they're sexual psychopaths.

'Pornography is sexually traumatising an entire generation of boys.'

By talking with sexual addiction experts such as Professor John E Grant of the University of Chicago, Dr Paula Hall, the UK's top sex addiction therapist, and Professor Matt Field from the University of Liverpool, we learned that the teenage brain is especially vulnerable to addiction.

The brain's reward centre is fully developed by the time we're teenagers, but the part of the brain that regulates our urges - the pre-frontal cortex - isn't fully developed until our mid-20s. The brains of teenagers are not wired to say 'stop', they are wired to want more. The implications of this study are profoundly troubling.

So who is going to take on the responsibility for protecting our children until they are old enough to do it for themselves?

Can we rely on schools? It strikes me that the current sex education system in the UK - where schools are obliged only to teach the basics of reproduction and the perils of sex, which they can opt out of anyway - is hopelessly outdated.
In the internet age, our children are turning to online porn for an alternative sex education - the worst place they can go.

The Mail claimed a victory in July when David Cameron announced that by the end of 2014 all 19 million UK homes currently connected to the internet will be contacted by service providers and told they must say whether family friendly filters that block all porn sites should be switched on or off.

But our TV show proved that determined children will always find a way around online blocks.

Ultimately, the responsibility lies with us, the parents. The age of innocence is over.

Like many parents, I fear that my boy's childhood could be taken away by pornography. So we have to fight back.

We need to get tech-savvy, and as toe-curling as it seems, we are the first generation that will have to talk to our children about porn.

We have to tell our kids that pornographic sex is fake and real sex is about love, not lust.

By talking to them, they stand a chance. If we stick our head in the sand, we are fooling only ourselves.

Wednesday, August 24, 2016


Thanks Jews!

Source Article:
The money behind the transgender movement Billionaire – George Soros opens his wallet to transform America

The money behind the transgender movement

Billionaire George Soros opens his wallet to transform America

It was a debate that had been percolating at the state level for years. …

The bathroom debate started in California, where the Gay Straight Alliance Network, an organization based in Oakland, has been lobbying hard for transgender rights. …

The GSA helped organize groups in North Carolina. …

In 2013, Mr. Soros‘ gave GSA $100,000.

The Los Angeles Gay and Lesbian Community Center also received $130,000 from Mr. Soros that year. Their Leadership Lab was published in the journal Science this spring, that evaluated the impact that door-to-door canvassing can have on reducing transphobia. It’s being used as national model. …

The Global Action for Trans Equality (GATE), headquartered in New York, received $244,000 from Mr. Soros. It’s main purpose is to pull all the LGBT organizations together in order to create a louder megaphone, laying out best practices and fundraising advice.

So what’s next for the movement?

Mr. Soros‘ IRS Form 990 gives us some clues.

He’s funded a Streetwise and Safe organization in New York, with the purpose of supporting a “national project focused on increasing safety for LGBTQ youth during interactions with law enforcement and developing advocacy skills to engage debates around discriminatory policing practices,” according to his 2014 tax return.

Mr. Soros also gave $525,000 to Justice at Stake….

Entire Article

Saturday, August 20, 2016


My talk from Free Your Mind 4 (April 2016) has just been released on youtube. This talk outlines the deliberate and methodical manipulation of human sexuality during the 20th century. Beginning with the Rockefeller-funded "research" of Professor Alfred Kinsey, a well known sadomasochist and pedophile, and continuing on with the introduction of pornography which now saturates our world and has been moved into kindergarten classrooms, our children, our relationships, and even our ability to love is under direct assault. In less than one hundred years, the Luciferian forces have succeeded in manipulating us to such an extent, that our sexual behavior and attitudes have been radically altered, as well as our ability to create happy families and enduring human love. It is imperative for us to understand the mechanisms by which we and our children are being targeted so that we can put a stop to this madness and throw a kink in the control system that seeks to destroy our lives.

This talk is a condensed version of a much longer presentation which goes deep into the mechanisms by which we have been manipulated -- and offers solutions regarding how we can free ourselves from this control. If you would like to know more, please visit this link.

Please also share this video widely so that others will have access to this information.

Pornography and the Deliberate Manipulation of Human Sexuality

Friday, August 5, 2016


Source Article:
First Strike – The Dark Side of The Vitamin K Shot

Apart from the emotional & psychological trauma inflicted on a newborn from getting the Vitamin K shot, the actual amount of Vitamin K injected into a baby’s bloodstream/deep muscle tissue is 20,000 times the needed dose; which represents the first strike undermining capacity for natural immunity.

The injection also contains a toxic preservative, Benzyl alcohol, that can be especially harmful on your baby’s delicate, young immune system.

A parent has to keep asking themselves, ‘Is this procedure really necessary?’ The answer is typically, no! Natural health awareness requires a genuine paradigm shift away from the limitations of western ‘Allopathic’ medicine, a re-education toward self sufficiency.

Trusting in nature’s storehouse of resources, understanding the proportional requirements which best serve the body; the learning curve toward such know-how takes a lot more convincing, especially given the onslaught of mainstream Vaccine Industry propaganda targeting our communities. Knowledge of holistic health provides the only viable solution to halting this trend.

It is also crucial for parents to intervene & sign the necessary paper-work via your family doctor BEFORE your baby is born. Thus you will avoid any oversight by the nursing staff on duty. Remember, the administering of the Vitamin K shot is a STANDARD procedure in most mainstream Medical institutions. Therefore you must make your decision NOT to vaccinate your baby clear to all attending hospital staff members.

The father-to-be should carry all necessary forms (several copies) in his back pocket at all times during the delivery phase. Do not allow your baby to be taken away for a general “health” inspection before handing over these crucial documents.

Make sure you declare your intentions as a family unequivocally, ‘Our baby is not to receive ANY vaccines, whatsoever.’

Note: The same prudent caution should be applied when considering the Hepatitis B shot (typically given within 12 hrs after birth).

Hepatitis B Vaccine – 3 doses, 1st round administered at 12 hours old (after birth): Research scientists have now identified and admitted to a direct causal link between subcutaneous/intramuscular injection of the Hepatitis B Vaccine and resulting Mitochondrial dysfunction (hallmark symptom of Autism); including premature apoptosis or “programmed” type cell death. The Hepatitis B vaccine factors into the eventuality of Early Onset Autism, since it represents the earliest premature breach of a baby’s delicate, under-developed “electrical grid system” (Myelin sheath, Meninges & Blood Brain Barrier).

‘exposure of Hepa1-6 cells to a low dose of adjuvanted hepatitis B vaccine leads to loss of mitochondrial integrity, apoptosis induction, and cell death…‘ In vivo apoptotic effect of hepatitis B vaccine was observed in mouse liver.‘…’Boys vaccinated as neonates had threefold greater odds for autism diagnosis compared to boys never vaccinated or vaccinated after the first month of life. Non-Hispanic white boys were 64% less likely to have autism diagnosis relative to non-white boys. Findings suggest that U.S. male neonates vaccinated with the hepatitis B vaccine prior to 1999 (from vaccination record) had a threefold higher risk for parental report of autism diagnosis compared to boys not vaccinated as neonates during that same time period.‘

Official Package Insert: ‘10 µg/mL Each 1 mL dose of sterile suspension contains hepatitis B surface antigen 10 µg adsorbed onto approximately 0.5 mg of amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate. Formaldehyde-treated. Thimerosal (mercury derivative) 1:20,000 (50 µg/mL) has been added only to the preservative-containing formulations. 3-dose vials of 3 mL‘…’A portion of the hepatitis B virus gene, coding for HBsAg, is cloned (synthetic genomics) into yeast, and the vaccine for hepatitis B is produced from cultures of this recombinant yeast strain.‘

Note: It is highly advisable to delay the cord-clamping of the placental connected umbilical cord (while this lifeline is still pulsating), to maximise the nutritional flow from the Placenta, and minimize any undue stress on your baby, during this vital transition phase. Make certain your family doctor is advised of this decision well in advance. You may also consider abstaining from allowing hospital staff to acquire a DNA blood sample, given the fact that such confidential information is routinely shared in a National DNA data bank. Your baby is not a statistic.

‘Babies who have been identified as being at risk for vitamin K deficiency include those born to mothers who took drugs or antibiotics during pregnancy, premature babies and babies who are born cesarean. Mothers who had maternity diets low in high vitamin K foods or had diets that were low in fat have also been identified as being more likely to bear vitamin K deficient babies.‘

I’ve encountered parents who claim their children are vaccine-free but for the Vitamin K shot. Such is another clear misconception parents have to begin addressing. Your baby will normally acquire sufficient levels of Vitamin K via the placenta & colostrum; (typically within the first week after birth).

In the rare instance a mother is a carrier of the ‘hemophiliac gene’; where-in she possesses a damaged X chromosome which can be passed on to the child, her baby theoretically becomes vulnerable to Vitamin K deficiency, and in extreme cases, the potential for hemorrhaging. The female body, however, is designed to counter this very problem.

The point is, the undue risk of vaccines is routinely exaggerated without just cause, safe alternatives discouraged.

‘Every DNA molecules is composed of two strands. When a cell detects a DNA duplex with a difference between its two DNA strands, that duplex is “repaired” by the rather Draconian expedient of chopping out the entire region, on both strands of the DNA molecule. No effort is made by the cell to determine which strand is correct — both are discarded. The gap that this creates is filled by copying off the sequence present at that region on the other chromosome. All this editing happens when the two versions of the chromosome are paired closely together in the early stages of gamete (egg and sperm) formation, the process we biologists call meiosis.

‘All females have two copies of the “so-called” X chromosome. The X chromosome is about the same size as other 22 human chromosomes, which also occur in pairs, and like them is packed with some 1000 genes. The reason there are two copies of the X and other chromosome is to allow for the repair of the inevitable damage that occurs over time to individual genes because of wear-and-tear, chemical damage, and mistakes in copying. Because this sort of damage is passed on to offspring, it tends to accumulate over time. For this reason, genes must be edited every so often to repair the accumulated mutations (biologists call damage to genes mutation).‘

Doctors stubbornly adhere to this invasive procedure without any consideration of its traumatic nature on a newborn; typically lacking an overall holistic understanding of natural immunity. The Vitamin K shot, like that of Hepatitis B administered at 12 hours old, has its own inherent risks which place it in a similar tier & category to all other early shots given to babies. Just say, “No thank you!”

Try to always find the optimal organic source which contains the given Vitamin in it’s natural form, and ensure that it is pure, without derivatives or chemical and/or synthetic additives. As an example Kale contains the optimal balance of Vitamins A, C, E & K – a powerhouse of antioxidants. In the case of your baby you can puree the vegetable enough to ensure it is palatable. If you have no alternative then choose a supplement that is proven to be 100% natural & organic; but again natural is superior.

Additionally the mother’s placenta & breast milk (Colostrum) are inextricably linked, providing a baby’s primary initial source of nourishment through the long journey of formation in utero; while supplying the basic building blocks of life necessary to guarantee a safe transition into early childhood development. Mothers to be are advised to store up on phytonutrients while your baby is in utero. Continue nourishing the immune system especially during the 1st year after your child is born. Remember mothers, you share the same immunity with your baby during the entire in utero phase (all three trimesters), and for the many months after your baby is born, whilst breast-feeding!

‘Phytonutrients work as antioxidants to disarm free radicals before they can damage DNA and cell membranes. Recent research indicates that the phytonutrients in vegetables like kale work at a much deeper level, signaling our genes to increase production of enzymes involved in detoxification, the cleansing process by which the body eliminates harmful compounds.

Kale is a rich source of organosulfur compounds, which have been shown to reduce the risk of many cancers, especially one of the most deadly forms, colon cancer; due to their unique role in blocking the growth of cancer cells and inducing cancer cell death (apoptosis). Organosulfur compounds known as glucosinolates are present in the cruciferous vegetables of the Brassica genus. These compounds are broken down into potent anticancer compounds called isothiocyanates in the body, which are powerful inducers of cancer-destroying enzymes & inhibitors of carcinogenesis.’

Kale, Collard Greens, Mustard Greens and Turnip Greens are all cruciferous vegetables with deeply detoxifying properties. They cleanse and detoxify the liver, skin, digestive tract, lungs and reproductive organs.

They are high in calcium, vitamins C, A, E, (including Vitamin K), folate, B6 and zinc. Like broccoli, these greens are an important source of calcium because their vitamin C content significantly increases absorption.

In addition to its deep cellular cleansing properties, broccoli is high in vitamins C, K and A, all powerful antioxidants for supporting the immune system and detoxifying the skin cells. It is also noted for its calcium content, which is in a more available form than calcium from dairy. Calcium must bind with vitamin C to be fully absorbable, and broccoli provides a high dose of each.

Broccoli, cauliflower, cabbage and brussels sprouts are all edible flowers that cleanse the liver and reduce cancer of the colon, prostate, ovaries, lung and bladder. Combining broccoli with tomatoes is especially potent for protecting against prostate cancer. In addition, the broccoli and cauliflower leaves are also edible, containing more beta carotene (vitamin A) than the flower. Broccoli also contains lutein which protects the eyes and prevents cataracts.‘

‘The body does not readily utilise synthetic vitamins and minerals. The vitamin K administered by hospitals to newborns is the synthetic phytonadione. The natural forms of vitamin K that are found in many foods, particularly in vegetables such as collard greens, spinach, broccoli, asparagus, brussels sprouts and salad greens, are a different form – they are called phylloquinone or menaquinone. Certain bacteria in the intestinal tract also produce menaquinones.

Apart from its synthetic nature, it is based on plant Vitamin K and injected. The body utilises vitamins and minerals that are found in plants and creates the human form it needs, but this is after they go through the digestion process, which obviously does not occur with injections.‘

The Vitamin K shot has been linked to leukaemia, including acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, which is characterized by an increased number of white corpuscles in the blood, and accounts for about 85 percent of childhood leukaemia. Research carried out by Dr. Louise Parker, of the Sir James Spence Institute of Child Health in Newcastle upon Tyne, produced the most startling results. Dr. Louise Parker was quoted in the British Medical Journal in 1998 as stating, “It is not possible, on the basis of currently published evidence, to refute the suggestion that neonatal IM vitamin K administration increases the risk of early childhood leukemia.’

Vitamin K Vaccine: Package Insert

AquaMEPHYTON injection is a yellow, sterile, aqueous colloidal solution of vitamin K1, with a pH of 5.0 to 7.0, available for injection by the intravenous, intramuscular, and subcutaneous routes.

Each milliliter contains:
Phytonadione: 2 mg or 10 mg

Inactive ingredients:
Polyoxyethylated fatty acid derivative : 70 mg
Dextrose: 37.5 mg
Water for Injection, q.s: 1 mL
Added as preservative: Benzyl alcohol: 0.9%

Toxic effects of benzyl alcohol, including respiratory failure, vasodilation, hypotension, convulsions, and paralysis have been known for years. However, little is known about the toxic effects or levels of benzyl alcohol in neonates, especially in sick premature infants. Animal toxicity studies show an LD((50)) of approximately 33 ml/kg (300 mg/kg) in rats treated by rapid intravenous infusion with 0.9% benzyl alcohol, although 40 ml/kg (360 mg/kg) by slow intravenous infusion was tolerated without mortality.

Benzyl alcohol is normally oxidized rapidly to benzoic acid, conjugated with glycine in the liver, and excreted as hippuric acid. However, this metabolic pathway may not be well developed in premature infants. The benzyl alcohol may therefore have been metabolized to benzoic acid, which could not be conjugated by the immature liver but accumulated, causing metabolic acidosis.

Sixteen neonatal deaths thought to be caused by the benzyl alcohol preservative used in some intravascular solutions have been reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by 2 medical centers. The deaths occurred in pre-term neonates weighing 2500 gms who had central intravascular catheters flushed periodically each day with bacteriostatic normal saline containing 9 mg/ml benzyl alcohol. Ten deaths occurred in 1 institution over a 6-month period and 6 deaths occurred in the other institution over a 16-month period. Investigators in the 2 hospitals have reported that similar deaths have not occurred since flush solutions without preservatives have been substituted for those with the benzyl alcohol.‘ CDC

The European Directive ‘Excipients in the Label and Package leaflet of Medicinal Products for Human Use‘ , states the following with respect to the parenteral use of benzyl alcohol:

‘Exposure to less than 90 mg/kg/day: Must not be given to premature babies or neonates. May cause toxic reactions and allergic reactions in infants and children up to 3 years old.

Exposure to more than 90 mg/kg/day: Must not be given to premature babies or neonates. due to the risk of fatal toxic reactions arising from exposure to benzyl alcohol in excess of 90 mg/kg/day, this product should not be used in infants and children up to 3 years old.’

Dr. Joesph Mercola Interviews Dr. Cees Vermeer on Vitamin K

List of Top 10 Foods Highest in Vitamin K

Thursday, August 4, 2016


Dear parents -- you know that cord blood they stole from your baby at birth? Well, the founder of Paypal wants to use it to create immortality.

Beware VAMPIRES masquerading as humans!!

"...If there’s one thing that really excites Thiel, it’s the prospect of having younger people’s blood transfused into his own veins..."

Source Article:
Paypal Founder Peter Thiel Is Pursuing Immortality With His Billions

Billionaire Peter Thiel believes it all: Singularity, Convergence, Transcendence and most importantly, Transhumanism. In other words, Thiel wants to become immortal and live forever, essentially becoming a god. He is spending his billions to achieve it. ⁃ TN Editor

More than anything, Peter Thiel, the billionaire technology investor and Donald Trump supporter, wants to find a way to escape death. He’s channeled millions of dollars into startups working on anti-aging medicine, spends considerable time and money researching therapies for his personal use, and believes society ought to open its mind to life-extension methods that sound weird or unsavory.

Speaking of weird and unsavory, if there’s one thing that really excites Thiel, it’s the prospect of having younger people’s blood transfused into his own veins.

That practice is known as parabiosis, and, according to Thiel, it’s a potential biological Fountain of Youth–the closest thing science has discovered to an anti-aging panacea. Research into parabiosis began in the 1950s with crude experiments that involved cutting rats open and stitching their circulatory systems together. After decades languishing on the fringes, it’s recently started getting attention from mainstream researchers, with multiple clinical trials underway in humans in the U.S. and even more advanced studies in China and Korea.

Considering the science-fiction promise of parabiosis, the studies have received notably little fanfare. But Thiel has been watching closely.
Thiel and Ambrosia.

In Monterey, California, about 120 miles from San Francisco, a company called Ambrosia recently commenced one of the trials. Titled “Young Donor Plasma Transfusion and Age-Related Biomarkers,” it has a simple protocol: Healthy participants aged 35 and older get a transfusion of blood plasma from donors under 25, and researchers monitor their blood over the next two years for molecular indicators of health and aging. The study is patient-funded; participants, who range in age from late 30s through 80s, must pay $8,000 to take part, and live in or travel to Monterey for treatments and follow-up assessments.

Ambrosia’s founder, the Stanford-trained physician Jesse Karmazin, has been studying aging for more than a decade. He became interested in launching a company around parabiosis after seeing impressive data from animals and studies conducted abroad in humans: In one trial after another, subjects experience a reversal of aging symptoms across every major organ system. While the mechanisms at play aren’t totally understood, he said, young organisms’ blood not only contains all sorts of proteins that improve cell function; somehow it also prompts the recipients’ body to increase its production of those proteins.

“The effects seem to be almost permanent,” he says. “It’s almost like there’s a resetting of gene expression.”

While Ambrosia advertised the study to attract participants, it didn’t seek broader coverage. So Karmazin was somewhat surprised to get a message from Jason Camm, chief medical officer at Thiel Capital, who expressed interest in what the company was doing. (Karmazin said he hasn’t reached out to any investors: “I’d really want to talk about what the business model would be.”)

Read Full Article Here


Pitocin is a biochemical weapon. It is designed to disrupt the natural birthing process and undermine the mother's ability to produce natural oxytocin. Oxytocin is the hormone of love and bonding. When this hormone (in its natural form) is absent during labor and birth, there will be a breakdown in mom's ability to love her child and she will likely have trouble breastfeeding.

In addition, Pitocin also stimulates extremely painful uterine contractions that are intense and unrelenting. These unnatural contractions often lead to fetal distress as the uterus is turned into a trash compactor and the baby's oxygen supply is choked off.

Pitocin can lead to uterine hyperstimulation and even uterine rupture. It is the main reason that at least 1/3 of all births in the U.S. end up with c-section and it is a major contributor to the neurological and behavioral issues we are seeing in children today.

Piticon is designed to cause trauma and brain damage in children. In fact, every hospital intervention during childbirth is designed to cause trauma and to attack the neurological integrity of the child as well as his/her psychological and spiritual development.

Hospitals are Luciferian temples of the occult. The rituals that take place within the walls of these evil places have wreaked havoc upon our species and caused an overwhelming breakdown in family love. This is intentional.

Below is an excerpt from my book, Birth Trauma and the Dark Side of Modern Medicine, followed by several articles of importance on this topic, including a long list of pitocin side effects.

"Pitocin is another drug that is used against label every day in the United States for the induction (and augmentation) of labor. Like Cytotec, Pitocin has not been approved by the FDA and, on the contrary, the FDA, along with the World Health Organization, and even The Physician’s Desk Reference warn against the use of Pitocin for the elective induction of labor...

The use of Pitocin to induce or augment labor can lead to a number of serious complications including uterine rupture, uterine hyperstimulation, postpartum hemorrhage, fetal distress, fetal asphyxia, fetal heart abnormalities, low APGAR scores, permanent central nervous system, brain damage, and death.

Despite the long list of serious complications caused by this drug, a 1992 University of Texas survey reveals that 81% of women in U.S. hospitals received Pitocin to induce or augment labor. “Pitocin inductions are a leading cause of C‑sections” and are one of the main reasons the U.S. has one of the highest C-section rates in the world.

“Pitocin is most often used to induce labor before it has begun naturally (its other use is to augment a labor that has already begun). When the body is not yet ready for the birthing process that it is being forced into, the result is often excessive maternal discomfort and fetal stress… Pitocin-induced contractions lack a slow build-up and are much stronger/harder, faster, and more frequent than normal. When uterine contractions are too hard and/or too long, uterine blood flow is reduced and the baby is deprived of oxygen. It’s important to remember that the baby experiences every contraction just as the mother does. Unnaturally strong and long contractions, produced by Pitocin, are quite difficult for the baby, not just painful for the mother. And while a mother opts for pain medication to numb her experience of the monster contractions, the baby does not experience pain relief. When the baby experiences the increased pain and decreases of optimal oxygen supply from these unnatural contractions, his heart rate is compromised, which prompts the diagnosis of “fetal distress,” and leads to the conclusion that a C‑section is “necessary” to “save” the baby. Of course, the OB is merely “saving” the baby from the unnecessary and dangerous complications that were caused by the administration of the induction drugs.”

Pitocin is artificial/synthetic oxytocin. Its use during labor tricks the mother’s brain and interferes with her ability to produce natural oxytocin. If natural oxytocin is not pumping through mom’s body during childbirth, her ability to bond with, breastfeed, and experience love for her baby is severely undermined. Not surprisingly, Pitocin use during labor disrupts bonding and breastfeeding and damages the newborn’s oxytocin receptor sites for life.

“Oxytocin is centrally related to our natural capacity to give birth. When we have a scheduled C-section, for example, there is no oxytocin release in the mother’s brain, and thus a severe interruption in the establishment of the postnatal oxytocin circuitry wiring in the newborn…

[A]fter just 3 or 4 generations of highly technological childbirth, it seems very possible that our human oxytocin system is weakening.”

What this means is that any infant born to a mother given this diabolical drug during the birth process can grow into a brain damaged adult that may become habitually depressed and have difficulty creating healthy relationships and/or experiencing human love throughout life. The use of this drug during labor is not only undermining the bonds of love between mother and child, but also the child’s potential to be happy later in life.

Furthermore, if we want to understand why so many people are becoming addicted to drugs like Oxycodone, we need only look to their damaged oxytocin receptor sites and recognize that these wounded souls are desperately trying to attain feelings of well‑being that should come naturally to them but do not because of the drugs they were exposed to early in life.

Incidentally, Pitocin and Oxycodone have very similar chemical formulas, with Oxycodone being made up of C18H21NO4 and Pitocin being made up of C43H66N12O12S2.  It would be an interesting study to find out how many Oxycodone addicts were born to mothers who were given Pitocin or some other version of synthetic oxytocin during birth.

Pitocin induction is now being associated with an increased chance for autism in children – especially in boys.

It is well known that Pitocin use in labor causes fetal distress. The reasons for this are many, but a primary problem with the use of Pitocin is that it creates a persistent stream of very intense contractions that turn the uterus into a trash compactor instead of a birthing vessel. For the mom, the unrelenting contractions quickly become unbearable and an epidural or some other form of pain relief is requested. For the baby, whose protective padding (i.e., the amniotic sac) has likely been forcefully broken by medical staff (through amniotomy or the “breaking of the waters”) and who is also likely to have an internal fetal heart monitor literally SCREWED INTO ITS HEAD (which probe pulls and tugs at the baby’s head with every contraction), Pitocin contractions are not only unbearably painful, but can quickly become life-threatening."

Source Article by Elaine Stillerman, LMT
The Truth About Pitocin

"There is a little publicly known law in New York (Public Health Law, Section 2503), passed in 1978, that requires all physicians and midwives to fully disclose and require informed consent from laboring women regarding the use of all drugs during labor and delivery.

Unfortunately, many care providers fail to tell their patients about the potential side-effects and possible risks involved in administering one of the most common drugs used during labor, pitocin. Pitocin is a synthetic form of oxytocin, the natural hormone that stimulates the onset of labor, promotes a sense of well-being and enhances maternal bonding, given to women to induce or augment labor. It's manufactured from the pituitary extract of various animals, and combined with acetic acid for pH adjustment and less than one percent of chloretone as a preservative.

The routine use of pitocin is not backed by any scientific data, and the side-effects of pitocin during labor (and sometimes during the third stage of labor to assist the expulsion of the placenta) rarely are discussed with the laboring woman. Regardless of how many labors are induced with pitocin, most of them are not medically necessary.

During the 1980s, Dr. Roberto Caldreyo-Barcia, a former president of the International Federation of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a renowned researcher into the effects of obstetrical interventions commented, "Pitocin is the most abused drug in the world today." He claimed its use was medically necessary in only about 3% of labors, yet estimates of its use range from 12% to 60%. Often, the drug is administered without the woman's knowledge and she never is told of its potential harmful risk factors.

The Physician's Desk Reference supports the use of pitocin only when medically necessary and advises to begin with a minimum dosage to see how the laboring mother tolerates it. The mother should receive oxygen and continuous electronic fetal monitoring, since fetal distress is more common with pitocin use and needs to be carefully watched.

The natural rhythm of labor is supported by the release of oxytocin in bursts as needed, whereas pitocin is administered as a constant IV drip that confines most women to bed. This decreases their ability to control the escalating pain caused by drug-induced uterine activity, and laboring women are more likely to require pain medication that slows labor. Think of the dichotomy: pitocin is administered to speed up labor, but the increased level of pain requires medication that slows it down. In addition, pitocin often has no effect on cervical dilation even though the contractions are much stronger.

Pitocin might cause a tumultuous, difficult labor and tetanic contractions, rupture of the uterus and dehiscence of a uterine scar, lacerations of the cervix, retained placenta or postpartum hemorrhage. Postpartum perineal and pelvic floor pain is increased as a result of augmented uterine contractions. Fetal complications might include fetal asphyxia and neonatal hypoxia, physical injury and neonatal jaundice. The use of pitocin also might be a factor in cerebral palsy from deprived oxygen and autism.

Dr. Eric Hollander of Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York presented a theory at a 1996 annual meeting of the American Psychiatric Association that linked autism with pitocin-induced labors. He put forward the idea that pitocin interferes with the newborn's oxytocin system that results in the social disabilities of autism. When he gave autistic children oxytocin, it made them four times more talkative and twice as happy, although some patients did not respond.

(Author's note: consider how the heightened, augmented uterine contractions might impact the soft fetal cranium and its possible injurious affect on the cranio-sacral system.)

Pitocin was first synthesized in 1953, and became available for use two years later. By 1974, it was an established medical fact that its failure rate was 40% to 50%. In 1978, an FDA advisory committee removed its approval of pitocin for the elective induction of labor. Interestingly, the drug never was approved by the FDA for use in augmenting labor.

While not all women and their babies are harmed by the use of pitocin, there are natural ways to coax labor that are rather effective and have no potential risks. Orgasms cause the release of oxytocin that might initiate the onset of labor in late pregnancy. Sex always has been a recognized method of starting labor. Sperm contains prostaglandins that encourage the cervix to ripen. Spicy foods, long walks, nipple stimulation, certain herbs such as blue cohosh (Excessive amounts of blue cohosh might raise maternal blood pressure to dangerous levels and might have an overdosing effect on the baby. A naturopath or herbalist should be consulted before recommending this or any herb to your pregnant clients), the use of castor oil, acupuncture, massage and general relaxation techniques might all be effective in initiating labor without the harmful side-effects of pitocin.

Labor is a complex physiological function that begins with the harmonious synchronicity of the fetus, mother and placenta. Any intervention of these essential participants offsets the balance and rhythm of labor. Babies, like fruit, ripen in their own time. The best way to promote a healthy pregnancy, labor and birth is to let the forces of nature work at their own pace.


ACOG, "Induction of Labor," ACOG Technical Bulletin 217, Dec. 1995.
AJOG, "Elective Induction v Spontaneous Labor: A Retrospective Study of Complications and Outcomes," 1992.
Goer, Henci, Obstetric Myths v Research Realities, Westport: CT, Bergin and Garvey, 1995.
Griffin, Nancy, "Let the Baby Decide: The Case Against Inducing Labor - Use of the Drug Pitocin is Questioned," Mothering Magazine, 2001.
ICEA, "Induction of Labor in Postterm Pregnancy," ICEA Review 12:1, 1988.
Inch, Sally, Birth Rights, New York: Pantheon, 1984.
JAMA Statistical Bulletin, January 21, 1998.
"Life in a Parallel World: A Bold New Approach to the Mystery of Autism" Newsweek, May 13, 1996.
Korte, Diana and Scaer, Roberta, A Good Birth, A Safe Birth, New York: Bantam, 1984."

Source Article:
Pitocin’s untold impact

Michel Odent, MD, founder of the Primal Health Research Centre, has spent decades studying the “primal period.” Odent defines the primal period—prenatal, birth, and the first year of life—as the time “when the basic adaptive systems—those involved in what we commonly call health—reach their maturity” (Source). Today’s Midwifery Today E-News shared a quote from Odent about synthetic oxytocin [Pitocin] and the potentially detrimental impact it can have on a fetus’s oxytocin receptors. Here’s an excerpt:

80% of the blood reaching the fetus via the umbilical vein goes directly to the inferior vena cava via the ductus venosus, bypassing the liver, and therefore immediately reaching the brain: it is all the more direct since the shunts (foramen ovale and ductus arteriosus) are not yet closed. . . . Furthermore, it appears that the permeability of the blood-brain barrier can increase in situations of oxidative stress—a situation that is common when drips of synthetic oxytocin are used during labor. We have, therefore, serious reasons to be concerned if we take into account the widely documented concept of “oxytocin-induced desensitization of the oxytocin receptors.” In other words, it is probable that, at a quasi-global level, we routinely interfere with the development of the oxytocin system of human beings at a critical phase for gene-environment interaction.

Oxytocin is the hormone of love and bonding and human connection. If the oxytocin system is damaged, or a child’s oxytocin receptors become desensitized, the ramifications are huge. As more and more scientists study oxytocin’s impact, we can see how crucial our body’s oxytocin systems can be for human life, love, and happiness.

Animal research suggests that oxytocin is one of our mind and body’s best defenses against stress, anxiety, and depression:

In a study presented at the 2007 Society for Neuroscience meeting, Grippo, Porges and Carter compared the stress reactions of female prairie voles living for four weeks either in isolation or with a female sibling and found greater levels of stress, behavioral anxiety and depression in those separated from their siblings. The team then gave the animals either oxytocin or saline every day during the last two weeks of the four-week period. The isolated animals treated with oxytocin no longer showed signs of depression, anxiety or cardiac stress. By contrast, oxytocin had no measurable effects on those paired with siblings, suggesting that “the effects of oxytocin are most apparent under stressful conditions,” Carter says. (Tori DeAngelis, “The two faces of oxytocin“)

If Michel Odent is right about prolonged Pitocin exposure desensitizing a fetus’s oxytocin receptors, then it’s possible that these children will grow up with impaired abilities to cope with stress, leading to higher rates of depression and anxiety.

Other research indicates that induction (and cesarean births) may lead to a higher incidence of autism:

A 2004 study out of Australia found that autistic children were twice as likely to have been born without natural labor, either by elective cesarean or induction. (Jennifer Block, Pushed, p. 139)

And that oxytocin administration benefits autistic individuals:

[P]sychiatrist Eric Hollander, MD, of Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and colleagues found that adults diagnosed with autism or Asperger’s disorder who received oxytocin injections showed an improved ability to identify emotional content on a speech comprehension task, while those on a placebo did not. (Tori DeAngelis, “The two faces of oxytocin“)

There are implications for drug addiction as well:

In rats, intravenous self-administration of heroin was potently decreased by [oxytocin] treatment. . . . [Oxytocin] receptors in the [central nervous system]–mainly those located in limbic and basal forebrain structures–are responsible for mediating various effects of [oxytocin] in the opiate- and cocaine-addicted organism. (Kovacs GL, Sarnyai Z, Szabo G, Oxytocin and addiction: a review)

Someone close to me was on Prozac several years ago. He told me that, while it reduced his depression, it also reduced his ability to feel any and all emotions. He felt nothing. Empty. From what I understand, his experience is not uncommon. Perhaps it’s because Prozac (fluoxetine) seems to “inhibit the action of oxytocin” (Cantor JM, Binik YM, Pfaus JG, Chronic fluoxetine inhibits sexual behavior in the male rat: reversal with oxytocin). Could that empty emotional void be what it feels like to live as a child whose oxytocin receptors were damaged at birth?

And I haven’t even touched yet on the other potential negative effects of Pitocin. All this from a drug used daily to induce labor for doctor or patient convenience (a use for which it has not been approved by the FDA) and far too often for less-than-concrete “medical” reasons. Jennifer Block shared these eye-opening statements in Pushed:

A recent ACOG survey found that in 43% of malpractice suits involving neurologically impaired babies, Pitocin was to blame. (p. 137)

Even Williams Obstetrics offers a sobering history: “Oxytocin is a powerful drug, and it has killed or maimed mothers through rupture of the uterus and even more babies through hypoxia from markedly hypertonic uterine contractions.” (p. 138)

The truth is that we really don’t know all the ways synthetic oxytocin might be affecting our children (or ourselves as mothers). There are certainly situations where Pitocin use is warranted and acceptable, but those cases are far less common than current use would suggest. Without a doubt our society has a Pitocin abuse problem. How many women do you know who have been given Pitocin? How many of them do you think are aware of the potential problems associated with that drug? I have a feeling that future generations, after further inquiry and research, will end the rampant use of Pitocin (and the atrocious practice of “Pit to distress,” see here and here). But I fear what damage may be done in the meantime."

Source Article:
Pitocin Side Effects

As well as its needed effects, oxytocin (the active ingredient contained in Pitocin) may cause unwanted side effects that require medical attention.

If any of the following side effects occur while taking oxytocin, check with your doctor or nurse immediately:


convulsions (seizures)
difficulty in breathing
fast or irregular heartbeat
headache (continuing or severe)
pelvic or abdominal pain (severe)
skin rash or itching
vaginal bleeding (increased or continuing)
weight gain (rapid)
Incidence not known:
Abdominal pain or cramping
blood clotting problem that causes prolonged bleeding
chest pain or discomfort
difficulty swallowing
extra heartbeats
pounding or rapid pulse
puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips, or tongue
severe bleeding after giving birth
shortness of breath
tightness in the chest
unusual tiredness or weakness

If any of the following symptoms of overdose occur while taking oxytocin, get emergency help immediately:

Symptoms of overdose:

slow to respond
slurred speech

Severity: Minor

Some oxytocin side effects may not need any medical attention. As your body gets used to the medicine these side effects may disappear. Your health care professional may be able to help you prevent or reduce these side effects, but do check with them if any of the following side effects continue, or if you are concerned about them:


For Healthcare Professionals
Applies to oxytocin: compounding powder, injectable solution

Cardiovascular side effects have included hypertension, premature ventricular contractions, sinus tachycardia, and other cardiac arrhythmias. Neonatal bradycardia, premature ventricular contractions and other arrhythmias have been reported.[Ref]

Nervous system
Nervous system side effects have included mania-like disturbances and seizures. The seizures may have been related to water intoxication. Neonatal seizures and permanent CNS or brain damage has been reported.[Ref]

Metabolic side effects have included water intoxication resulting in coma and seizures.[Ref]

Hypersensitivity side effects have included anaphylactic reactions.[Ref]

Genitourinary side effects have included pelvic hematoma. Excessive doses have produced pelvic fracture, uterine hypertonicity, spasm, tetanic contraction and rupture.[Ref]

Hematologic side effects have included postpartum hemorrhage and fatal afibrinogenemia.[Ref]


Hepatic side effects have included neonatal jaundice.[Ref]

Gastrointestinal side effects have included nausea and vomiting.[Ref]

Respiratory side effects have included pulmonary edema.[Ref]

Renal side effects have included decreases in glomerular filtration rate and renal plasma flow. Doses of 40 milliunits per minute may produce significant decreases in urine output.[Ref]

Local side effects have included nasal irritation and rhinorrhea.[Ref]

Ocular side effects have included neonatal retinal hemorrhages.[Ref]

Psychiatric side effects have included memory impairment and mania in patients on high doses.[Ref]


General side effects have include low Apgar scores at 5 minutes. Fetal death has been reported.[Ref]

1. Evron S Ariely S Agasi M Eger G Bukovsky I Caspi E "Severe peripheral arteriospasm following oxytocin administration." Am J Obstet Gynecol 155 (1986): 657-8

2. Lazo JS, Sebti SM "Bleomycin." Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif 15 (1994): 44-50

3. "Product Information. Syntocinon (oxytocin)." Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ.

4. Hendricks CH Brenner WE "Cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs used post partum." Am J Obstet Gynecol 108 (1970): 751-60

5. Nakano J "Cardiovascular actions of oxytocin." Obstet Gynecol Surv 28 (1973): 75-92

6. "Product Information. Pitocin (oxytocin)." Pfizer U.S. Pharmaceuticals Group, New York, NY.

7. Plumer MH "Letter: Oxytocin-induced venous spasm?" Anesthesiology 44 (1976): 87-8

8. Dawood MY "Pharmacologic stimulation of uterine contraction." Semin Perinatol 19 (1995): 73-83

9. Johnstone M "The cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs." Br J Anaesth 44 (1972): 826-34

10. Schwartz RH Jones RW "Transplacental hyponatraemia due to oxytocin." Br Med J 1 (1978): 152-3

11. Goodlin RC "Oxytocin may explain neonatal seizures" Am J Obstet Gynecol 161 (1989): 259

12. Pedlow PR "Syntocinon induced convulsion." J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw 77 (1970): 1113-4

13. Muller FJ Van Zyl-Smit R "Oxytocin-induced water intoxication. A case report." S Afr Med J 68 (1985): 340-1

14. Mwambingu FT "Water intoxication and oxytocin." Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 290 (1985): 113

15. D'Souza SW Lieberman B Cadman J Richards B "Oxytocin induction of labour: hyponatraemia and neonatal jaundice." Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 22 (1986): 309-17

16. Jensen I Bruns BJ "Water intoxication after oxytocin-induced midtrimester abortion." N Z Med J 89 (1979): 300-2

17. Ansseau M Legros JJ Mormont C Cerfontaine JL Papart P Geenen V Adam F Franck G "Intranasal oxytocin in obsessive-compulsive disorder." Psychoneuroendocrinology 12 (1987): 231-6

18. Slater RM Bowles BJ Pumphrey RS "Anaphylactoid reaction to oxytocin in pregnancy." Anaesthesia 40 (1985): 655-6

19. Morriss WW, Lavies NG, Anderson SK, Southgate HJ "Acute respiratory distress during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. A probable case of anaphylactoid reaction to Syntocinon." Anaesthesia 49 (1994): 41-3

20. Maycock EJ, Russell WC "Anaphylactoid reaction to Syntocinon." Anaesth Intensive Care 21 (1993): 211-2

21. Kawarabayashi T Narisawa Y Nakamura K Sugimori H Oda M Taniguchi Y "Anaphylactoid reaction to oxytocin during cesarean section." Gynecol Obstet Invest 25 (1988): 277-9

22. Spears FD, Liu DW "Anaphylactoid reaction to syntocinon?." Anaesthesia 49 (1994): 550-1

23. Taylor RW Taylor M "Misuse of oxytocin in labour" Lancet 1 (1988): 352

24. Wiener JJ Evans AS "Uterine rupture in midtrimester abortion. A complication of gemeprost vaginal pessaries and oxytocin. Case report" Br J Obstet Gynaecol 97 (1990): 1061-2

25. Sweeten KM, Graves WK, Athanassiou A "Spontaneous rupture of the unscarred uterus." Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 (1995): 1851-5;disc. 1855-6

26. Leventhal JM Reid DE "Oxytocin-induced water intoxication with grand mal convulsion." Am J Obstet Gynecol 102 (1968): 310-1

27. Robichaux WH, Perper JA "Massive perinatal hepatic necrosis from maternal oxytocin overdose." Pediatr Pathol 12 (1992): 761-5

28. Connor BH Seaton PG "Birth weight, and use of oxytocin and analgesic agents in labour in relation to neonatal jaundice." Med J Aust 2 (1982): 466-9

29. Dwyer N "Managing the third stage of labour. Nausea is a fair price for preventing haemorrhage." BMJ 308 (1994): 59

30. Munsick RA "Renal hemodynamic effects of oxytocin in antepartal and postpartal women." Am J Obstet Gynecol 108 (1970): 729-39

31. Kennett DJ Devlin MC Ferrier BM "Influence of oxytocin on human memory processes: validation by a control study." Life Sci 31 (1982): 273-5

32. Cordano A Kraus V "Clinical experience with oxytocin." Obstet Gynecol 39 (1972): 247-53

33. Beck LR Flowers CE Jr Blair WD "The effects of oxytocin on fetal scalp temperature." Obstet Gynecol 53 (1979): 200-2

It is possible that some side effects of Pitocin may not have been reported. These can be reported to the FDA here. Always consult a healthcare professional for medical advice.

Monday, August 1, 2016


The last few minutes of this video are so intense, I was brought to tears. This is a very powerful video. Please watch.

Expulsion Of The Jews Throughout History [Impressive Achievement]


This is a well written, in depth article on the true appropriate diet for Mankind. Humanity has been deceived by Luciferian forces that have taught us that the murder and consumption of animals is normal and good for us. Nothing could be further from The Truth.

Source Article:
Humans are Frugivores – We’re Designed To Eat Mostly Fruit

Humans are designed to eat mostly fruit. We’re frugivores, just like monkeys and chimps. We have the same physiology, the same stomach acidity, the same tooth structure, the same sweat glands, etc. The evidence suggesting humans are primarily fruit eaters is so overwhelming, that it just goes to show how influential our educational indoctrination truly is.

We are the most biologically advanced species on Earth. Fruit is the most advanced part of a plant. It has to be, since it’s responsibilities relies solely on the progeny of the plant itself. Fruit, in its strict botanical sense, is the fleshy and ripened ovary of a plant, enclosing the seeds.

Have you ever meant someone who doesn’t like fruit? I sure haven’t. We’re told that it’s high in sugar so we should limit our intake, however fruit doesn’t really contain any sugar, at least not our conception of it. We’ve mistakenly equated man-made sugar with God-made sugar. It’s not the same stuff, not even close. One promotes cancer and death, the other, health and vitality.

We instinctively crave fruit. Put a strawberry and a cheeseburger in front of a baby and see which she goes for. Fruit is sweet, and it’s sweet for a reason. It tastes good. This is a clue for humans, so they know to eat it. This first clue would be it’s appealing color, which immediately grabs our attention. The second would be it’s appealing aroma. All species have instructions in their DNA to tell them what to eat and how to live, and humans are no exception. Our trichromatic vision seeks out fruit.

Andrew Smith of the University of Stirling in Scotland believes that trichromacy provides an important advantage for fruit eating species. (which includes apes, orangutans, chimps, monkeys, and humans)

Humans have so-called trichromatic, or three-color, vision. So do Old World species such as chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans. -NatGeo

Fruit isn’t just ‘fruit’. It is ‘the Fruit’, the fruit of the plant. The fruit contains the seed of the plant, it’s only hope for progeny and survival. Because of this, the fruit is biologically designed to be the most advanced part of the plant, and extremely appealing to frugivorous onlookers who will hopefully spread its seeds far and wide. It’s vitally important for fruit to stand out with its vibrant colors and appealing aroma. It’s begging to be picked off the branch, eaten and reproduced. It’s a mutually beneficial trade off. The fruit eaters get to enjoy a mighty tasty snack, and in exchange we assist the plant’s propagation and reproduction. Everybody wins.

Frugivory is thought to have evolved as a mutualism to facilitate seed dispersal in plants. In general, an animal benefits by receiving sustenance from the plant by consuming the fruit. If the animal swallows the seeds of the fruit and later travels to a new area, it assists the propagation of the plant by dispersing the seeds when it defecates. –Brittanica.

Fruit is the easiest food to digest, which should right there, tip us off that we are biologically designed to eat it. Just because we are able to digest other foods, does not make us fit for their consumption. Omnivores are designed to eat everything. Humans can eat meat, but they are not designed to, which means they are not true carnivores or omnivores.

Flesh eaters have very short intestines for the rapid expulsion of decomposing flesh. Vegetarians and Fruitarians, including man, have very long intestines, for the slow digestion of fruit and vegetables.

Imagine you’re the only person on Earth, there is no infrastructure, there are no restaurants, only you and the wilderness. Soon you’ll undoubtably get hungry. What are you going to eat? There are animals running around everywhere, so you could kill one and cook it over a fire. But time is of the essence and you need something to eat now, not later. Besides, the act of killing an unarmed animal and tearing its flesh apart doesn’t exactly sound too appealing.

Luckily there are other options. You could eat some broccoli you found, but you’ll notice it doesn’t taste that good unless it’s at least steamed, not to mention the difficulty in digestion. You could dig up some carrots and eat them, but that too would require effort. The divine architect didn’t provided us with sufficient digging tools. We do however have eyes that seek out bright colors, and hands that are perfect for grabbing and peeling freshly ripened fruit right off the vine.

Beyond the biological evidence, consider that while carnivores take pleasure in killing animals and eating their raw flesh, any human who killed an animal with his or her bare hands and dug into the raw corpse would be considered deranged. Carnivorous animals are aroused by the scent of blood and the thrill of the chase. Most humans, on the other hand, are revolted by the sight of raw flesh and cannot tolerate hearing the screams of animals being ripped apart and killed. The bloody reality of eating animals is innately repulsive to us, more proof that we were not designed to eat meat. -peta

Proponents of the theory that humans should be classified as omnivores note that human beings do in fact possess a modified form of canine teeth. However, these so-called canine teeth are much more prominent in animals that traditionally never eat flesh, such as apes, camels, and the male musk deer. It must also be noted that the shape, length and hardness of these so-called canine teeth can hardly be compared to those of true carnivorous animals. -Vasu Murti

If there are a bunch of fruit trees, one can say that whoever created these fruit trees wanted some apples. In other words, by looking at the order in the world, we can infer purpose and from purpose we begin to get some knowledge of the Creator, the Planner of all this. This is, then, how I look at God. I look at God through the works of God’s hands and from those works imply intentions. From these intentions, I receive an impression of the Almighty. -Arno Allan Penzias

We don’t have claws or hoofs like carnivores and herbivores. We aren’t equipped with sharp teeth and abrasive tongues for ripping apart flesh. In order for meat to taste good we have to cook it. What other species on Earth cooks their food?

Herbivores (grazers and browsers – bison, rabbits, horses, sheep, deer, goats, giraffes, etc. ) are equipped to handle an exclusive raw leaf/grass diet. Granivores (primarily birds) thrive mostly on the raw grains of various grasses.

Carnivores (cats, lions, tigers, wolves, etc.) eat raw meat, but even they cannot thrive on an all meat diet.

Insectivores (ant-eaters, amphibians, other insects) thrive on raw insects.

Omnivores (hogs, brown bears, raccoons, etc.) are “everything eaters” who thrive on nearly all raw foods.

Frugivores (humans, apes, gorillas, chimpanzees, monkeys, orangutans etc.) thrive mostly on raw fruits, succulent fruit-like vegetables, roots, shoots, nuts and seeds.

Those foods and influences to which a species is biologically adapted are those deemed “natural” to its disposition as derived by the sum total of their biological heritage from millions of years of evolution. Cumulative adaptations in each species over eons of time determines their natural dietary needs.

We humans are arboreal (tree dwellers), mostly closely resembling orangutans. Like chimps and monkeys, we are designed to eat mostly fruit. This isn’t to say we can’t also eat vegetables, nuts and seeds, so long as raw fruit is our main course.

“The alternative to treatment is true naturopathy (detoxification), a little known science of nature that has been used for hundreds of years by hundreds of thousands of people and animals worldwide. It has restored health and vitality to their physical, emotional and mental bodies. Detoxification encompasses the sciences of chemistry, biochemistry, botanical science and physics and has always been at the heart of true healing. For that reason, detoxification should be at the heart of natural medicine today, but has been forgotten in our modern world of treatment.”
~ Robert Morse, ND.

Paleopoo: What We Can Learn from Fossilized Feces

Recent research by anthropologists shows that we had an arboreal past. Our genetic ancestors were once tree dwellers. At that time, our genetic ancestors depended upon products of the tree, and later upon the fruits of stalk and vine for our sustenance. Dr. Alan Walker, an anthropologist of John Hopkins University in Maryland, has done research showing that early humans were once exclusively fruit eaters. By careful examination of fossil teeth and fossilized human remains with electron microscopes and other sophisticated tools, Dr. Walker and his colleagues are absolutely certain that early humans until relatively recently, were total fruitarians. These findings were reported in depth in the May 15, 1979 issue of the New York Times.

Science Verifies That Humans’ Ancestors Were Frugivores

Proof That Humans Are Fruit Eaters!

In 1971, a short-term study by B. J. Meyer was published in the South African Medical Journal describing how lipid profiles and glucose tolerances improved on a particular fruitarian diet. In a further trial in the study, body weights of overweight subjects showed a tendency to “level off” at the “‘theoretically ideal’ weight”. -wikipedia

I do not intend to enter into any lengthy discussion of comparative anatomy and physiology at this place, but will content myself with saying that every anatomical, physiological and embryo-logical feature of man definitely places him in the class frugivore. The number and structure of his teeth, the length and structure of his digestive tract, the position of his eyes, the character of his nails, the functions of his skin, the character of his saliva, the relative size of his liver, the number and position of the milk glands, the position and structure of the sexual organs, the character of the human placenta and many other factors all bear witness to the fact that man is constitutionally a frugivore. -Herbert M. Shelton

Eating foods foreign to our species specific diet are mucus forming and lead to dis-ease.

Arnold Ehret claimed that pus- and mucus-forming foods were the cause of human disease, “schleimlose” (slime-free) foods were the key to human health and “fasting (simply eating less) is Nature’s omnipotent method of cleansing the body from the effects of wrong and too much eating.”The term mucus, a glyco-protein acid, derives from the Greek “myxa”. In 1812, William Cullen referred to mucus as ‘butyraceous matter’ and in 1877, Gustav Schlickeysen referred to a mucus layer beneath the human skin in Obst Und Brod. It was later termed ‘mucin’ by Dr. Teofilo De La Torre in the 1950s,’mucous’ by Morris Krok in the 1960s, ‘impacted fecal matter’ by Norman Walker in the 1970s ‘mucoid matter’ by Robert Gray in the 1980s,and ‘mucoid plaque’ in the 1990s. In the 2000s, Daniel Reid re-introduced the term ‘mucus’. Gray made a further distinction between healthy and unhealthy mucus, and how certain substances left an internal residue which the body suspended in mucu, in contrast with a fruitarian diet.

Having denounced the nitrogenous-albumin metabolic theory in 1909, Ehret learned of a contemporary, Thomas Powell M.D., in 1912, who concurred with his belief that “grape sugar” (simple sugars in fruits and vegetables) was the optimum fuel source, body building material and agent of vitality, for humans, not protein rich foods -wikipedia (Arnold Ehret)

“Disease is an effort of the body to eliminate waste, mucus and toxemias, and this system assists Nature in the most perfect and natural way. Not the disease but the body is to be healed; it must be cleansed, freed from waste and foreign matter, from mucus and toxemias accumulated since childhood. You cannot buy health in a bottle, you cannot heal your body, that is, cleanse your system in a few days, you must make “compensation” for the wrong you have done your body all during your life. My system is not a cure or a remedy, it is a regeneration, a thorough house-cleaning, the acquisition of such clean and perfect health as you never knew before.” -The Mucusless Diet Healing System. by Arnold Ehret

Fruit as the Treatment of Cancer and Diabetes!

It is “off point” to think that one must “kill” or starve a cancer cell. Yes, sugar feeds all cells even cancer cells this is off point though in that to starve a cancer cell you will affect all your cells. This same philosophy is used in chemotherapy and in the medical community. This is ridiculous in that if you damage or weaken your other cells, they will then become your new A-typical or cancer cells. The point of cancer is your sewer system – the Lymphatic System. It is your “sewer system” which removes and neutralizes cellular wastes (acids) and damaged cells. It’s the “acids” that can kill you. By the way, the pH of chemotherapy is equivalent to battery acid!

Hippocrates Institute, in my opinion, is quite off base and can hurt people who have sugar metabolism problems where fruit would help them tremendously. All of our diabetics get fruit. Diabetes is one of the easiest conditions to cure! To summarize: those who have higher fasting glucose levels are starving their cells for essential carbon, which is vital in keeping a cell healthy and alive. Fruits would be very advisable in these cases, as fruit sugars can be used by cells where pancreatic and adrenal function can block glucose (vegetable sugar) entry. You might initially have some blood glucose “loading” but this will disappear and your cells will be getting energy and therefore, the atrophy will stop.

Remember also that fruits are much more electrical (energetic) to one’s body and are much higher in antioxidants and astringents than vegetables, which makes them ideal in cancer cases where one must understand the lymphatic system. -Dr. Robert Morse

A Tragic Myth: The Truth About Sugars

As the engine in your car needs a carbon-based fuel to run, so does your physical body. Of the main constituents, your body needs to function amino acids, fatty acids, and sugars are primary. However, it is sugar mixed with oxygen that your body requires to run the machine. To understand sugars better, simple definitions of sugars are necessary.

Monosaccharides: A single or simple sugar, e.g., glucose, fructose, or galactos, also known as carbohydrates

Poly or Disaccharides: Starch or complex sugars consisting of several glucose/fructose bonds depending upon the type of starch or carbohydrate.

Your body uses digestion to separate the simple from the complex. In other words, your body can’t use proteins, it can only use amino acids. So the body must break down a complex amino acid structure (called a protein) into amino acids; fats to fatty acids; and starch or complex sugars to simple sugars. With this factual information, it should start to become evident that sugars are a big factor in health! Your body mixes glucose or fructose with oxygen to achieve cellular energy known as ATP (adenosine triphosphate). Without ATP a cell will weaken and become attacked (mainly by parasites), or bonded with a virus, or antigen.

You must understand your body does not use proteins for energy. It is only the adrenaline or epinephrine in meat that is energetic. This is a problem in that your adrenal glands are supposed to supply your body with adrenaline, when needed, for nerve function.

When you consume complex sugars, as in anything complex, your body now has to deal with the overload of simple sugars and now has to store them as fat, excrete what it can, and use the fungal family to help it rid itself of all the unneeded sugar (since sugars are mostly carbon bonds that are broken down into carbonic acid.) Now we are back to excessive acidosis.

The same is true with proteins and fats. A lot of man’s toxemia comes from excess proteins, fats, and sugars, which are broken down into acids, stored and/or parasitically acted upon. With a stagnant lymphatic system, this creates: systemic acidosis, body odors, culturing of parasites (bacterium, fungi, protozoa’s, etc.) all of which starts the inflammatory (immune) response leading to the atrophy of the body.

Fruit (sugars) and Candida (fungus)

It is said, ” Sugars feed Candida. I hope with the above understanding you can see through this myth! If you put out a piece of cheese, a slice of bread, and some grapes or a ripe banana on the counter in your kitchen, which one is going to grow mold (fungus) on it first? It will be a race between the bread and cheese. The fruit will only grow mold as it begins to ferment, since the cheese and bread are already fermented.

Remember: Nature uses the parasitic kingdom to clean and eliminate that which is not needed, damaged, or in someway loses its ability to support life in a healthy way. Fermentation and putrefaction are the processes of decay, or breakdown, which require parasitic action. Healthy cells and lymph do not require parasitic action. Of course this includes the cells in your body. With this understanding, what type of sugar could feed Candida (yeast, fungus, molds, warts, etc.)? That’s right… STARCHES and EXCESS COMPLEX SUGARS!

Sugars (fruit) and Cancer

“Sugars feeds cancer” is another tremendous myth. To claim sugars feed cancer is to deny what decades of science has proven. To starve the body for a sugar is to starve the cell of its energy. This causes cancer. Starvation, acidosis, and ketosis damage cells. A damaged cell is on its walk down the road to A-typical and becoming a cancer cell. This is also true of proteins and refined fats or too many supplemented fatty acids.

Remember: The body is simplistic. More is not better. Less is often times better e.g., fasting of all types, under-eating, etc. Acids feed cancer as acids create inflammation and the parasite response to the above. As previously stated, glucose and fructose are both simple sugars. To say a fruit feeds cancer is also saying vegetables feed cancer. This is all stupid thinking! Even the American Cancer Society recommends a high fruit and vegetable diet!

There are many properties that make fruit superior to vegetables. Fruits are higher in antioxidants and astringents and will move your lymphatic system far better than vegetables. This is why one sees a lymphatic response when fruit is consumed. That is what you want! Fruits, also being a simple sugar, are superior for diabetics, pancreatitis, hepatitis, and all other gastric and intestinal conditions. Fructose does not require insulin or extensive digestive enzymes. Fruits’ magnetic (electrical) energy is the highest of all foods, making them superior brain and nerve foods. They will bring energy to the body where most other foods take it away. NEVER FEAR THE USE OF FRUITS!
-Dr. Robert Morse

Special thanks to: Mark James Gordon, Dr. Robert Morse, Arnold’s Way, Brian Rossiter, Kevin Hinton, Cullen Smith, Tony Wright, & Susan Willman.

Web Resources:

Fruitarianism and Vegetarianism (Chapter 17) – The Hygienic System – Herbert M. Shelton

21 Articles-Early-Human-Diet

Natural Human Diet according to Biological and Evolutionary Evidence

Humans Developed Eating Fruit

Biological Adaptations

Comparative Anatomy of Eating

Fruitarianism in the Bible

High Protein Diets Can Kill You

Sweet Natural Living


Arnold Ehret – Mucusless Diet Healing System

Arnold Ehret – Rational Fasting

Bragg – The Miracle of Fasting

Easy to be Raw Recipes

The Great Lymphatic System

Raw Secrets

Iridology Simplified – Bernard Jensen


The Raw Truth Recipes and Resources for the Living Foods Lifestyle

Stanley Burroughs – The Master Cleanser (Detox)

The Cause of Disease by Kenneth S. Jaffrey

Tell Me Simply by Kenneth S. Jaffrey

Nature Cure (self

Natural Foods – Kenneth S. Jaffrey


Dr. Robert Morse – The Detox Miracle Sourcebook


Deep Detox Using FRUIT

Our unique symbiotic relationship with specialized plant development environments (fruit)
Tony Wright

Detox With Fruit!

Humans are Frugivores – Youtube Playlist

An Open Debate on Fruit Sugar

The following if the opening chapter from Dr. Robert Morse’s “The Detox Miracle Sourcebook” (PDF)

Final Notes:

Fruit is vital to our existence. Personally, without fruit, I don’t know what I would do. Fruit has transformed my life since I began this journey back in 2012. Since then my diet has been at least 51% fruit. I’ve eliminated my own health problems with diet alone. When you know what you are biologically designed to eat, it’s not rocket science.

In all the healing modalities I’ve come across, raw fruit is always the common denominator. Raw fruit is THE ANSWER to most of your health problems. Please, for the love of God, try eating a primarily fruit diet, and sit back and watch your dreams come to fruition.